Agenda and decisions

Date of hearing

6 August 2019

Members of  Sub-Committee

Councillor Frank Pickett,

Councillor Colin Woodcock

Councillor Stephen Woodliffe

Premises Licence Holder

Boston European Supermarket Ltd

Premises Address

Boston Supermarket, 8 George Street, Boston

Date Application Received

29 April 2019

Details of Application

Review of a premises licence in accordance with the Licensing Act 2003 – submitted by The Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police.

The Parties:

Lincolnshire Police requested a review of the Premises Licence for Boston Supermarket, 8 George Street, Boston, on 29 April 2019.  No representations in respect of the review were received.   The Licence holder is Boston European Supermarket Ltd. The Designated Premises Supervisor for Boston Supermarket is Salar Ali KARIM who is also the sole director of Boston European Supermarket Ltd.

Policy and Guidance:

In reaching its decision the Sub-Committee has considered the statutory guidance issued under section 182 of Licensing Act 2003 and Boston Borough Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy.

Licensing Objectives:  The Sub-Committee has found that the licensing objectives of prevention of crime and disorder and public safety are relevant to this application.

Decision and Reasons:

The Sub-Committee has read and heard all of the information before them.

The Sub Committee is aware of and has taken into account any implications that may arise from the Human Rights Act 1998. 

The Sub-Committee in reaching its decision has had due regard for its public sector equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 and consider that in reaching their decision today, that they have had due regard for the duty placed upon them by s.149.

The Sub-Committee heard from the Licensing & Land Charges Manager, Lincolnshire Police and Ms Cartmell on behalf of the premises licence holder.

The sub-committee has noted the offence of abstraction of electricity that occurred during 2018/2019.  It notes that the majority of money has now been paid back to the utility company.  The sub-committee has noted that during the time of the abstraction Mr Karim was the DPS at the property.  Mr Karim’s representative has advised the sub-committee that whilst he was in control during the time of the abstraction due to a back problem he had passed more control to his son.  Mr Karim advised the committee that he was unaware of the abstraction and this was undertaken by his son.  Mr Karim states he has since sacked his son and he no longer works at the premises

The sub-committee note that there have been some minor issues in respect of licence compliance but there had been no major concerns.

The sub-committee has grave concerns regarding Mr Karim’s ability to undertake the role of DPS given the offence happened whilst acting in that role.  With this in mind the sub-committee has decided it is proportionate to remove Mr Karim as DPS.

In addition the sub-committee has heard that following the abstraction changes were made to the monitoring of the electricity supply and a maintenance contract had  ...  view the full decision text for item 1.