Agenda and decisions

Date of hearing

30 July 2025

Members of Sub-Committee

Cllr L Savickiene

Councillor R Austin

Councillor S Woodliffe

Premises Licence Applicant

Jaffna Ltd

Premises Address

3-4 Market Place, Boston

Date Application Received

10 June 2025

Details of Application

Application for the grant of a Premises Licence

The Parties:

The Licensing Sub-Committee convened to consider an application for a premises licence where relevant representations have been received.

At the hearing the Sub-Committee heard from Anna McDowell (Senior Licensing Officer), Mr Rasalingham (the applicant), and Lincolnshire Police.

Policy and Guidance:

In reaching its decision the Sub-Committee has had due regard for all that they have read, heard, and seen, and has considered the statutory guidance issued under Section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003, along with the Council's Statement of Licensing Policy, and their public sector duty under the Equality Act 2010.

Decision and Reasons:

The sub-committee heard from Lincolnshire police that the premises is in the heart of the PSPO area. Whilst the matter should be dealt with on its own merits nothing much had changed since the earlier application and the application belied the experience of the applicant. The application does not acknowledge that the premises is within the PSPO and doesn't engage with the problem with street drinking in the town or adequately address or promote the licensing objectives. The conditions proposed don't adequately address issues — examples were given in relation to the CCTV condition offered. The police provided a background to the levels of incidents occurring in the area. The police further noted that on 11^th July 2025 the premises failed a test purchase selling a vape to an underage child — in respect of identification the child was told to 'bring it next time' by the staff member who still sold the vape to the child.

Mr Rasalingham advised the sub-committee that the application include more conditions and they had good measures in place. In respect of the underage vape sale he acknowledged that the staff member shouldn't have sold the vape and that staff member had been put on further training. Mr Rasalingham advised he was on the premises most days and had 2 other members of staff. Mr Rasalingham advised he would be willing to include a partition in the premise with manual access to the alcohol area.

The sub-committee noted that the premises had been open for some months now and were of the view that the applicant should be fully aware of the PSPO and the issues in the area. They were concerned that despite that the application did not appropriately promote the four licensing objectives. They noted the failed test purchase and the response of the staff member regarding ID. The sub-committee considered conditions and were of the view that there were no conditions which would appropriately promote the licensing objectives, they noted as part of that the evidence of the failed test purchase, The sub-committee considered  ...  view the full decision text for item 1.