|
Reasons:
The
reasons for the sub-committee reaching this decision are as
follows:
The sub-committee
has read and heard all of the information before them.
The sub-committee
is aware of and has taken into account any implications that may
arise from the Human Rights Act 1998.
The sub-committee in
reaching its decision has had due regard for its public sector
equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 and
consider that in reaching their decision to grant the premises
licence that they have fulfilled their duty under the
Act.
In reaching their
decision, the sub-committee has read all of the papers before them,
and in addition heard from Fiona White, Licensing & Land
Charges Manager and Mr Byatt on behalf of the applicant, the
applicant herself, and her husband Mr Hatemi, and considered the representation received
from the Chief Officer of Lincolnshire Police. Sgt Enderby attended
the hearing to represent the police.
The sub-committee
heard from Mr Byatt how the application has been submitted in the
name of Mrs Ahmd (the applicant) only,
but it was the applicant and her husband’s intention that
they would run the premises together, and it was a family business.
The applicant and her family live above the premises.
The sub-committee
heard that neither the applicant nor her husband had yet completed
the personal licence course, but they intended to if the licence
were to be granted. It was confirmed to the sub-committee that the
applicant had no prior experience of running a licenced premises,
but that she had assisted her father in running a supermarket
previously. It was stressed ...
view the full decision text for item 1.
|