|
The
Parties:
The Licensing Sub-Committee
convened to consider an application for a premises licence where
relevant representations have been received.
At the hearing the
Sub-Committee heard from Anna McDowell (Senior Licensing
Officer)and Mr Crozier (on behalf of Arbor Club Ltd. Miss McDowell
read out an additional information received from an interested
party who could not attend the hearing due to ill
health.
Policy and Guidance:
In reaching its decision the
Sub-Committee has had due regard for all that they have read,
heard, and seen, and has considered the statutory guidance issued
under Section 182 of the Licensing Act 2003, along with the
Council’s Statement of Licensing Policy, and their public
sector duty under the Equality Act 2010.
Decision and Reasons:
In reaching their decision, of
particular note to the sub-committee were the following:
·
The concerns of local residents in respect of
potential for noise and open windows;
·
The agreement of Lincolnshire Police and the
applicant to a thorough set of conditions;
·
The fact the premises has been licensed before with
very similar hours;
·
The fact there are other licensed premises in the
vicinity who operate similar hours; and
·
The fact that Environmental Health have not
submitted a representation to the application, nor have there been
any historic complaints made to Environmental Health when the
premises was previously licensed.
The sub-committee have decided
that it is reasonable and proportionate to the promotion and
safeguarding of the licensing objectives to grant the application
subject to the hours as applied for and subject to the list of
conditions as agreed between the applicant and Lincolnshire Police.
Whilst the sub-committee note the concerns of local residents, they
consider that the list of conditions agreed with Lincolnshire
Police offers a full raft of
mitigation to address those
concerns and provide appropriate mitigation. They did not consider
there were any additional conditions to add, nor evidence put
before them on which they could reasonably amend the application.
They were also content having met the proposed Designated Premises
Supervisor that he will promote and uphold the licensing objectives
and so did not feel there was any evidence or justification to
exclude a licensable activity from the licence.
|