Agenda and draft minutes

To receive apologies for absence.

Apologies for absence were received from Councillors Neil Drayton, Andy Izard and Stephen Woodliffe.

[Councillor Richard Austin BME entered the meeting at 2.01pm prior to consideration of the above item.]

To receive declarations of interests in respect of any item on the agenda.

No declarations of interest were received.

To sign and confirm the minutes of the last meeting.

The minutes of the meeting held on 10^th June 2025 were approved as a correct record and signed by the Chairman.

To answer any written questions received from members of the public no later than 5 p.m. two clear working days prior to the meeting – for this meeting the deadline is 5 p.m. on Thursday 18^th September 2025.

No questions were received.

(A report by Christian Allen, Assistant Director - Regulatory)

The Committee considered a report by the Senior Licensing Officer, Anna McDowell, which set out the responses received following public consultation on the draft Statement of Licensing Policy. The consultation had run for eight weeks from 23^rd June 2025, and one response had been received, from Lincolnshire Police.

The Senior Licensing Officer summarised the key points raised by Lincolnshire Police, which included requests for:

·         Additional wording at Section 4 to reference the Public Space Protection Order (PSPO) and to expect applicants to demonstrate knowledge of the area in which their premises are situated.

·         The development and publication of a pool of model conditions for applicants, to be provided as a standalone document rather than appended to the policy.

·         Inclusion of guidance at paragraph 4.1.3 to encourage applicants to ensure that at least 75% of windows into retail areas remain free from obstruction.

·         Additional wording at paragraph 4.4 to include all forms of government-issued digital ID as acceptable for age verification.

·         Additional paragraphs in Section 13 to clarify that the Licensing Authority would take a serious view of criminal activity, including offences outside the direct scope of the Licensing Act, and would strongly consider revocation of licences where such activity was evidenced.

·         Guidance under Section 35.3 to recommend that premises selling alcohol for consumption off the premises within the PSPO area consider affixing waterproof labels to containers, detailing the premises’ name and address.

The Senior Licensing Officer advised that the suggested amendments had been incorporated into the draft policy in green text for ease of reference, and that the Committee was invited to consider and determine any further amendments before recommending the policy to Council for adoption.

Members discussed the report and commented as follows:

·         Members noted that only one response had been received to the consultation, from Lincolnshire Police, and queried the extent of the consultation. Officers confirmed that all responsible authorities, parish councils, and relevant trade representatives had been consulted, and the consultation had also been publicised on the Council’s website.

·         Members raised concerns regarding the practical enforcement of the window visibility, and the proportionality of such conditions. Officers advised that any conditions imposed must be proportionate, enforceable, and relevant to the individual premises.

·         Members discussed the enforceability of labelling requirements, and the proportionality of such conditions. Advice was given that the Statutory Guidance issued under S182 of the Act states that conditions cannot seek to manage the behaviour of customers once they are beyond the direct management of the licence holder and their staff but may impact on the behaviour of customers in the immediate vicinity of the premises. Officers advised that any conditions imposed must be proportionate, enforceable, and relevant to the individual premises and the potential benefit must be weighed up against the potential burden on the premises licence holder.

·         The Committee considered whether the policy should make certain measures compulsory, but it was noted that statutory guidance did not permit the imposition of standard conditions except where appropriate to individual cases.

·         Members raised concerns  ...  view the full minutes text for item 10.