Agenda item
DECISION NOTICE
DECISIONNOTICE FOR BEIRA ALTA DELI 18 WEST STREET BOSTON
Decision:
Boston Borough Council
Licensing Act 2003
Review of a Premises Licence
Decision Notice
|
Date of hearing |
29 July 2020 |
|
Members of Sub-Committee |
Councillor Jonathan Noble
Councillor Tom Ashton |
|
Premises Licence Holder |
Mrs P I Dos Santos Pereira |
|
Premises Address |
Beira Alta Deli, 18West Street, Boston |
|
Date Application Received |
3 June 2020 |
|
|
Licensing Act 2003 –submitted by The Chief Constable of Lincolnshire Police. |
The Parties:
Lincolnshire Police requested a review of the Premises Licence for Beira Alta Deli, 18West Street, Boston on the 3 June
2020. No representations in
respect of the review were received. The Licence holder is Mrs P I
Dos
Santos Pereira.
The sub-committee has heard from the Licensing & Land Charges Manager, Sgt Enderby and PC McConville from Lincolnshire Police and Mrs Pereira.
Policy and Guidance:
In reaching its decision the Sub-Committee
has had due regard forall that
they have read and heard and has
considered the
statutory guidance
issued under section 182 of
Licensing Act 2003 and
Boston Borough Council’s
Statement of Licensing Policy.
Licensing Objectives:
The Sub-Committee has found that the licensing objectives prevention of
crime and disorder,public safety, prevention of public nuisance and protection of children from harm are relevant to this application.
Decision and Reasons:
The Sub-Committee has read and heard all of the information before them. The Sub Committee is aware of and has taken into account any implications that may arise from the Human Rights Act 1998.
The Sub-Committee in reaching its decision has considered its public sector equality duty under section 149 of the Equality Act 2010 and consider that in reaching their decision today, that they have had due regard forthe duty
placed upon them by s.149.
The Sub-Committee heard from Sergeant Enderby and PC McConville on behalf of Lincolnshire Police, and Mrs Pereira the premises licence holder.
The Sub-Committee heard from the police outlining the evidence presented in thereviewapplication, whichincluded detailsabout thepremisesserving alcohol forconsumptionon thepremisesat atime whenregulations prevented it during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Sub-Committee also heard that peoplewereallowedto congregatein anareaimmediatelyoutside the premises doorway with no social distancing measures in place. In addition the police advised the Sub-Committee that there were 4 conditions on the licence and of those 4 conditions 2 had been breached by the licence holder.
Mrs Pereiraaddressed theSub-Committeeand acknowledgedthat shehad made a mistake and had sold alcohol to people to consume on the premises, although she stated the person on the premises during the police visit on 20th May2020 wasa friend.Mrs Pereiraconfirmedthat shewasaware ofthe order that had been made and was in effect from 21st March 2020 relating to the closureof premises.Mrs Pereiraadvisedthat shedidn’thavea refusal register immediately available, her licence on display or details of staff training availablewhenthe policevisited,but shedid havedetails ofchallenge25 which included a poster on the wall.
Withall theinformationbefore themthe
Sub-Committeeare ofthe viewthat the
licensing objectiveshavenot beenpromotedbythe premiseslicence holder,Mrs Pereira.The Sub-Committeedo notconsider
thatthereare
any conditions thatare appropriatefor inclusionon
thelicence andhavein
mind thatthere isevidencebefore themthat boththe
lawand currentlicence
conditions have been
breached. The removal of the DPS was not considered
appropriate, as at the
time the DPS was not
present, and Mrs Pereira
would remain thepremises licence holder. TheSub-Committee
areof the view that
giventhe circumstanceswithinwhichthe premiseswastrading atthe time and the serious consequences of non-compliance with government guidance and regulationsrelatingto theCovid-19pandemic thatsuspensionof the licenceis notappropriate.In thecircumstancesand withall matters considered the Sub-Committee are of the view that revocation of the licence is appropriate.
Appeal:
The Premises Licence Holder and Lincolnshire Police have a right of appeal to the Magistrates’ Court under Section 181 of the Licensing Act 2003.
The appeal must be commenced by notice of appeal to the
Justices’ Chief
Executive for the Magistrates Court within the period of 21
days
beginning
with
the day on which the appellant was notified by the Licensing Authority
of
the decision being appealed against.
Any appeal should be sent to: Lincoln Magistrates Court, 358 High St, Lincoln LN5 7QA
This decision does not take effect until the end of the appealperiod or if the decision is appealed, when the appeal is disposed of.
Upon hearing an appeal the Magistrates’ Court may
a)Dismiss the appeal,
b) Substitute for the decision appealed against any other decision which
could have been made by the Licensing Authority, or
c) Remit the case to the Licensing Authority to dispose of it in accordance with the direction of the court,
And make such orderas to costs it thinks fit.
Signed:
FionaWhite
Licensing & Land Charges Manager
On behalf of the Licensing Sub-Committee 30 July 2020